When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Society

"Cancel" That National Anthem? When Patriotic Lyrics Of The Past Hit Wrong Notes Today

Spain's national anthem, dating back to 1770, is the oldest in continual use — it also happens to be wordless. For other nations, what can be done about aging anthem lyrics that may need to be placed in their original context to avoid upsetting or offending contemporary ears.

Members of the Senegal football team sing their national anthem with hands over their hearts

Senegal sing their anthem during the FIFA World Cup 2022 match at Al Bayt Stadium, Qatar. December 4, 2022

Yannick Champion-Osselin

PARIS — Algeria’s national anthem, Kassaman (Oath), is a war song penned by jailed nationalist and poet Moufdi Zakaria in 1955 during the Algerian War of Independence against the French colonialists. Three out of five verses evoke fighting the colonization of Algeria, with the most controversial verse being the third, which calls out France directly.

In the 1980s, to avoid diplomatic tensions with Paris, Algeria decreed that the third verse could be omitted if the circumstances called for it. But on June 11, a presidential decree restored the controversial third verse, making all five verses obligatory. Now, Kassaman will be performed in its ‘full form’ at official events – allusions to imperialism included.

There was backlash from Paris, as French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna called the decision “outdated.” Algerian Foreign Minister Ahmed Ataf responded quickly that he was "astounded by the fact that the French foreign minister thought she could express an opinion on the Algerian national anthem."

Alas, this is far from an isolated topic, as people have vehemently expressed their views on whether anthems should be maintained, modified or scrapped for years.

While national anthems are often marches or hymns celebrating a military event, some are considered too bloody and graphic for modern times. Amongst those which literally evoke blood, often that of their enemies, are Algeria’s Kassaman, Portugal’s A Portuguesa, France’s Marseillaise, Vietnam’s Tiến Quân Ca (The Marching song) and Belgium’s La Brabançonne.


Altering these texts would surely be subject to great public debate, as these anthems are representative of a strong national pride and history. In the case of France’s La Marseillaise, some have called the song xenophobic and colonial, and would like to change it. Such a move, however, would require a constitutional amendment, as La Marseillaise was enshrined in its second article in 1879.

Music for the people

Meanwhile other anthems have come under fire for not being representative of the nations they are supposed to represent. In another former French colony, Senegal, the anthem is not in the majority local language, Wolof, but instead in French. Adopted in 1960, Le Lion rouge was composed by a Frenchman, its lyrics written by Senegal's first president. Since its text is strongly tied to the Senegalese landscape and people, would it not be better for people to sing their country’s anthem in their native language? Le Lion rouge has partially been translated, but the French version still remains most prominent.

The Star-Spangled Banner, is derived from a poem by a slave owner

The question of the anthem's composer has arisen in the U.S, where The Star-Spangled Banner, is derived from a poem by a slave owner, Francis Scott Key, who turns out had a very limited notion of “the Land of the free and the home of the brave. Indeed, amid the Black Lives Matter movement, along with statues of slave owners being pulled down, a petition circulated to change the The Star-Spangled Banner.

Hongkonger protesters sing while gathered at Parliament Square, London, England

Protesters are seen singing ''Glory to Hong Kong'' on the 4th year anniversary of the Hong Kong pro-democratic movement. London, United Kingdom, June 11, 2023

Hesther Ng/ZUMA

Iranian silence

Sung at important political events, sports matches, and in some countries sung in the classroom, the national anthem tends to be omnipresent in a country's psyche. But in protest, some groups have refused to sing their national anthem, often to show discontent towards their government.

In the months following Masha Amini’s death in police custody, Iranian athletes bravely demonstrated their solidarity with protesters by refusing to sing their national anthem. After the national men's football team stayed silent during their World Cup match against England, the team feared reprisals for this “insult” to their anthem and flag from the Iranian leadership, while their symbolic gesture was censored by the Iranian press.

There is also the reality of would-be "counter anthems," which are essentially protest songs that take on a national scale. Iran's theocratic authoritarian government has cracked down over the past year on the protest anthem Baraye, which had been woven together entirely from a Twitter hashtag trend of “Woman, Life, Liberty” to unite protesters against the Islamic Republic.

Meanwhile in Hong Kong, the unofficial national anthem has gotten so much traction that Google can no longer distinguish it from the state sanctioned one. Glory to Hong Kong was written and composed during the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests "to boost protesters' morale and unite people." In response, the Hong Kong authorities told schools to not allow it to be played, and authorities broke up public renditions of the song. In June, an attempt was made to ban the song, even from the internet, but was rejected by the High Court.

People walk by a musician playing 'Glory to Hong Kong' on the street in Hong Kong.

Glory to Hong Kong, Street performance in front of Quarry Bay Station in Hong Kong, China - 19 Nov 2022

Ben Marans/ZUMA

All thy sons ... and daughters?

Some national anthems around the world have been adapted to fit their countries contemporary values, such as inclusivity and historical memory. Canada modified their anthem to make it gender-neutral in 2018, changing part of the second line in "O Canada," from "in all thy sons," to "in all of us."

In 2021, Australia’s national anthem, Advance Australia Fair, had its lyrics changed from ‘For we are young and free’ to ‘For we are one and free’ in order to acknowledge the pre-colonial presence of Indigenous Australians, who were present on the island for far longer than the Europeans.

Prepare for our answer!

In a similar vein, the anthem has also been written in Dharug, an Australian Aboriginal language spoken around Sydney, and was sung at an international Rugby match in 2020.

Amidst the larger process of adapting a nation's anthem to the modern day, the update to Algeria’s anthem is not all that drastic, even if it has certain French politicians huffing. Sure, there's no doubt that Kassaman’s third verse is a not-so-subtle warning: "O France, this is the day of reckoning. So prepare to receive from us our answer!"

But the French are far more blunt — and graphic. La Marseillaise, after all, calls for violence against France’s enemies so that “impure blood waters our furrows.” Ooh la la...

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

FOCUS: Israel-Palestine War

Bibi Blinked: How The Ceasefire Deal Could Flip Israel's Whole Gaza War Logic

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has pushed ahead a deal negotiated via Qatar, for a four-day truce and an exchange of 50 hostages for 150 Palestinian prisoners. Though the humanitarian and political pressure was mounting, Israel's all-out assault is suddenly halted, with unforeseen consequences for the future.

photo of someone holding a poster of a hostage

Families of Israeli hostages rally in Jerusalem

Nir Alon/ZUMA
Pierre Haski

Updated Nov. 22, 2023 at 8:55 p.m.

-Analysis-

PARIS — It's the first piece of good news in 46 days of war. In the early hours of Wednesday, Israel agreed to a deal that included a four-day ceasefire and the release of some of the hostages held by Hamas — 30 children and 20 women — in exchange for 150 Palestinian prisoners, again women and children. The real question is what happens next.

For the latest news & views from every corner of the world, Worldcrunch Today is the only truly international newsletter. Sign up here.

But first, this agreement, negotiated through the intermediary of Qatar, whose role is essential in this phase, must be implemented right away. This is a complex negotiation, because unlike the previous hostage-for-prisoner exchanges, it is taking place in the midst of a major war.

On the Palestinian side, although Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh is present in Doha, he does not make the decision alone — he must have the agreement of the leaders of the military wing, who are hiding somewhere in Gaza. It takes 24 hours to send a message back and forth. As you can imagine, it's not as simple as a phone call.

And on the Israeli side, a consensus had to be built around the agreement. Benjamin Netanyahu's far-right allies were opposed to the deal — in line with their eradication logic — even at the cost of Israeli lives. But the opposition of these discredited parties was ignored, and that will leave its mark.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest