Sources

Are China's Colleges Too Easy? Universities Lament Low Dropout Rate

Peking University
Peking University
Eric Fish

BEIJING - Last month Shandong University announced that 97 of its students wouldn’t be granted their diplomas due to “poor academic performance after frequent warnings.”

Ninety-seven is a drop in the bucket next to the school’s 43,000 undergraduates; and even of those 97, all but 16 have been given a reprieve allowing them to graduate if they sign a “letter of commitment” to complete their classwork within a year. But that hasn’t prevented the school from taking flak.

Online commentator Lian Hongning wrote, “A university where every student worries about whether he can graduate is certainly no place for education. How can you focus on your studies when the fear of dropping out consumes your mind?”

However, most have supported Shandong University’s move or even criticized it for not going far enough.

While many countries lament their soaring college dropout rates, China may have just the opposite problem: Too many people finishing university. Some chalk this up to the success of China’s rigorous college entrance exam and family support systems. But others say the country’s universities have become too easy and are producing a glut of graduates that are saturating an already dismal job market.

China’s gaokao is infamous as one of the world’s most demanding college entrance exams. Solely deciding who can access most of the country’s 2,000 universities, it causes years of sweat, tears and unimaginable stress among its 9 million annual takers. But for the fortunate 75% who manage to pass, that stress won’t likely to carry over into university study.

About 54% of the students who enter U.S. universities don’t end up graduating, according to 2010 data from the OECD. In the UK, it’s 32%. Japan has one of the world’s lowest college dropout rates at 11%. But China appears to have them all beat.

In 2011, the Beijing-based Mycos Institute released a study showing that only 3% of China’s university students drop out. The Ministry of Education immediately refuted that “high rate” saying the true proportion was just 0.75%.

Pressure to succeed

Twenty-three-year-old Chuankai travelled from his central China rural hometown in 2009 to study at a college in Jinan, eastern China. For his parents, university was non-negotiable. They’d done hard labor their whole lives and would do anything to make sure he got an education. So when Chuankai failed the gaokao, it wasn’t enough to kill the family’s ambitions. They opted to enroll him in a private for-profit university that had just opened. The money he needed for just the first year was more than his parents made from a year of doing migrant construction work.

The tunnel-vision Chinese parents have for their child to get a college degree, and thus, a well-paying job that can help support them later in life, usually involves near total financial support. Chuankai says his family’s sacrifices put great pressure on him to get his diploma. However, that wasn’t the only source of pressure. “In the countryside, gossip is really bad,” he said. “Neighbors all know you’re studying, so if you come back without a degree it brings a kind of shame.”

Sang Guoyuan, an associate professor at Beijing Normal University’s Center for Teacher Education Research, says that social status is a powerful incentive for Chinese students to stay in school. “In the West, when students have difficulty during their studies, some choose to drop out and do other things that suit their interests and capability without feeling like they’re below others,” Sang said. “People's understanding of "social class" under China's cultural background is different.”

This pressure for students to graduate has shaped the way Chinese universities are run to be relatively strict compared to their Western counterparts. Curfews and travel restrictions are common and undergraduates are all assigned to a Fudaoyuan – a kind of school nanny that ensures students obey rules and study well.

College freshmen even begin their university life with two-to-three weeks of military training that’s designed in part to instill discipline and obedience. “Universities are held accountable for making sure people graduate,” says Yong Zhao, a University of Oregon professor who researches China’s education system. “Dropping out of college is almost unheard of. If you fail, it’s a failure of everybody.”

China’s low dropout rates don’t necessarily mean all students feel fire at their heels to work hard. After the years of toil and stress needed to pass the gaokao, some feel inclined to relax after they’ve conquered what they see as their life’s biggest hurdle. This is an attitude teachers tend to accommodate.

“The evaluation standards in universities aren’t very high,” said Sang Guoyuan. “Many poorly performing students are given "passes' by teachers or the administration as long as they attend classes.” 

In China, there are no such things as “weed-out courses” designed to make underachievers fail. Among foreign teachers, stories abound about school administrations that overturn failing grades without explanation or introduce easy last minute classes for students that don’t have enough credits to graduate.

An American teacher, who spoke on the condition he and his school not be named, taught at a well-known public university in Beijing from 2010 to 2011. When he tried to fail a student who never came to class once the entire semester and then skipped the final exam, he was rebuked by a higher-up. “The director basically gave me an ‘either you do it or we will do it’ type answer,” the teacher said.

“I was also told to pass on this information to other teachers with the explanation that it got more confusing if we failed a student. In fact, if a student failed another teacher’s class, and that teacher refused to change the grade, they had another teacher change it. I had to do this multiple times. We would have a make-up test (usually five minutes) and I would give them a grade,” said the teacher.

Cheating also plays a role in weak students snatching college degrees. An English language student, who also asked not to be identified, who graduated from a Top 50-ranked Chinese university in Nanjing in 2010 reported that cheating was par for the course among her classmates. For a national English exam they all had to take at the end of their senior year, several students found an ad in a campus bathroom offering to sell the answers beforehand.

“At least 10 to 15% of the students bought the answers,” she said. “Some of the worst students got the highest scores. The school must have realized this, but of course they did nothing.”

“No matter how much attention we pay to this problem, there are still a lot of students who cheat,” said Li Baoyuan, a professor of labor economics at Beijing Normal University. “It’s a sad thing, but more often, students tell teachers that they need to pass for this or that reason, and they get passed without cheating.”

Li compares Chinese universities to state-owned enterprises of the 1980s, saying they’re inefficiently controlled bureaucracies that have endemic politicking among teachers. Often, he says, professors are more concerned with climbing the ranks and furthering their own careers than taking time to evaluate their students properly.

“It has something to do with Chinese culture, with low respect for rules,” Li says. “In my opinion, many students are unqualified to get a degree.”

Diluting the Job Market

Each year more of these “unqualified” degree-holders join an already overflowing pool of college graduates in the job market.

According to the 2012 China Household Finance Survey, 16.4% of Chinese college grads under 25 are unemployed – nearly twice the rate of their American counterparts. If more of the six million students that graduate from China’s universities each year dropped out before completing their degree (or skipped college in the first place) it would likely improve everyone’s – including the dropouts’ – employment prospects.

The same survey found that the less education people under 25 have, the more likely they are to have a job. People with only a high school degree had half the unemployment rate as college graduates. That rate is nearly halved again among those with only an elementary school education.

Thanks to a boom in higher education development over the past decade, China now has more than triple the college enrollment it had in 2000. But demand in the workforce hasn’t kept pace and laborers are now more sought after than degree holders. “There’s been a big expansion in college admissions, it’s just crazy,” said Zhao Yong, the University of Oregon professor. “They weren’t ready for any of this. A lot of professors in China aren’t ready to teach and the facilities aren’t ready.”

Shandong University’s crackdown on unqualified students may be a sign of things to come for top schools wanting to improve the perceived worth of their degrees. Sang Guoyuan says that at his Beijing Normal University, students now face severe punishments and even expulsion when they’re caught cheating. Some schools have even instituted quotas on the proportion of students that must fail certain classes.

But so far, that doesn’t appear to be dissuading many young Chinese from chasing a college degree. At the end of his freshman year Chuankai, the student from Henan, was devastated to learn that his private university had run out of money and its president had disappeared. He and the other students discovered that the school was never officially registered – meaning their time there was wasted.

“I thought about going to technical school when the college went bankrupt,” Chuankai said. “But my classmates criticized me. They said, ‘your parents saved for you to go to college. How could you use their money for technical school?’”

 Since his school shut down in 2010, Chuankai has been doing odd jobs like selling school supplies on the street outside universities. He clings to the idea that he might one day be allowed to pursue a degree inside. This summer he’ll take the gaokao again for the fourth time.


Liu Jingyue contributed to this report

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

How Thailand's Lèse-Majesté Law Is Used To Stifle All Protest

Once meant to protect the royal family, the century-old law has become a tool for the military-led government in Bangkok to stamp out all dissent. A new report outlines the abuses.

Pro-Democracy protest at The Criminal Court in Bangkok, Thailand

Laura Valentina Cortés Sierra

"We need to reform the institution of the monarchy in Thailand. It is the root of the problem." Those words, from Thai student activist Juthatip Sirikan, are a clear expression of the growing youth-led movement that is challenging the legitimacy of the government and demanding deep political changes in the Southeast Asian nation. Yet those very same words could also send Sirikan to jail.

Thailand's Criminal Code 'Lèse-Majesté' Article 112 imposes jail terms for defaming, insulting, or threatening the monarchy, with sentences of three to 15 years. This law has been present in Thai politics since 1908, though applied sparingly, only when direct verbal or written attacks against members of the royal family.


But after the May 2014 military coup d'état, Thailand experienced the first wave of lèse-majesté arrests, prosecutions, and detentions of at least 127 individuals arrested in a much wider interpretation of the law.

The recent report 'Second Wave: The Return of Lèse-Majesté in Thailand', documents how the Thai government has "used and abused Article 112 of the Criminal Code to target pro-democracy activists and protesters in relation to their online political expression and participation in peaceful pro-democracy demonstrations."

Criticism of any 'royal project'

The investigation shows 124 individuals, including at least eight minors, have been charged with lèse-majesté between November 2020 and August 2021. Nineteen of them served jail time. The new wave of charges is cited as a response to the rising pro-democracy protests across Thailand over the past year.

Juthatip Sirikan explains that the law is now being applied in such a broad way that people are not allowed to question government budgets and expenditure if they have any relationship with the royal family, which stifles criticism of the most basic government decision-making since there are an estimated 5,000 ongoing "royal" projects. "Article 112 of lèse-majesté could be the key (factor) in Thailand's political problems" the young activist argues.

In 2020 the Move Forward opposition party questioned royal spending paid by government departments, including nearly 3 billion baht (89,874,174 USD) from the Defense Ministry and Thai police for royal security, and 7 billion baht budgeted for royal development projects, as well as 38 planes and helicopters for the monarchy. Previously, on June 16, 2018, it was revealed that Thailand's Crown Property Bureau transferred its entire portfolio to the new King Maha Vajiralongkorn.

photo of graffiti of 112 crossed out on sidewalk

Protestors In Bangkok Call For Political Prisoner Release

Peerapon Boonyakiat/SOPA Images via ZUMA Wire

Freedom of speech at stake

"Article 112 shuts down all freedom of speech in this country", says Sirikan. "Even the political parties fear to touch the subject, so it blocks most things. This country cannot move anywhere if we still have this law."

The student activist herself was charged with lèse-majesté in September 2020, after simply citing a list of public documents that refer to royal family expenditure. Sirikan comes from a family that has faced the consequences of decades of political repression. Her grandfather, Tiang Sirikhan was a journalist and politician who openly protested against Thailand's involvement in World War II. He was accused of being a Communist and abducted in 1952. According to Sirikhan's family, he was killed by the state.

The new report was conducted by The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), Thai Lawyer for Human Rights (TLHR), and Internet Law Reform Dialogue (iLaw). It accuses Thai authorities of an increasingly broad interpretation of Article 112, to the point of "absurdity," including charges against people for criticizing the government's COVID-19 vaccine management, wearing crop tops, insulting the previous monarch, or quoting a United Nations statement about Article 112.

Juthatip Sirikan speaks in front of democracy monument.

Shift to social media

While in the past the Article was only used against people who spoke about the royals, it's now being used as an alibi for more general political repression — which has also spurred more open campaigning to abolish it. Sirikan recounts recent cases of police charging people for spreading paint near the picture of the king during a protest, or even just for having a picture of the king as phone wallpaper.

The more than a century-old law is now largely playing out online, where much of today's protest takes place in Thailand. Sirikan says people are willing to go further on social media to expose information such as how the king intervenes in politics and the monarchy's accumulation of wealth, information the mainstream media rarely reports on them.

Not surprisingly, however, social media is heavily monitored and the military is involved in Intelligence operations and cyber attacks against human rights defenders and critics of any kind. In October 2020, Twitter took down 926 accounts, linked to the army and the government, which promoted themselves and attacked political opposition, and this June, Google removed two Maps with pictures, names, and addresses, of more than 400 people who were accused of insulting the Thai monarchy. "They are trying to control the internet as well," Sirikan says. "They are trying to censor every content that they find a threat".

Keep up with the world. Break out of the bubble.
Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS
MOST READ