When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Germany

'A Well-Meaning, Educated Anti-Semite' - Günter Grass Slammed For Israel-Iran Poem

Op-Ed: The 84-year-old German Nobel laureate's new poem entitled "What Must Be Said" accuses Israel of plotting to destroy Iran, while acknowledging the risk of being dubbed anti-Semitic. Grass's long-hidden stint as a

Günter Grass during a book signing in 2010 (Christoph Müller-Girod)
Günter Grass during a book signing in 2010 (Christoph Müller-Girod)
Henryk M. Broder

BERLIN - Günter Grass has written a poem called "Was gesagt werden muss' (What Must Be Said) that was published Wednesday in Germany by the Süddeutsche Zeitung daily. It starts off like this:

"Why do I keep quiet, I've been holding back too long..."

From these opening lines, some readers might think that the 84-year-old German Nobel literature laureate is finally about to explain why he kept quiet for so long about his stint with the Nazi SS. But that's not the case: the moralizing poet has moved on. This time it's about an immediate concern to us all. It's about sheer survival.

"Why do I keep quiet, I've been holding back too long about what's written on the wall, what an army has even been practicing for, and will make all survivors mere footnotes when it's over."

So Grass doesn't want to keep quiet any longer, and his logorrheic explosion is about the "right to strike first" claimed by an unnamed country -- Israel. Strike what? Iran, a country that even he admits has a "loud-mouth" as its president.

"But why am I avoiding naming this country, which for years has secretly been building its potential for nuclear strikes and refusing all inspections and controls?"

Grass kept silent -- and was reluctant to name Israel -- because he didn't want to risk being branded anti-Semitic.

"This silencing of something that is a matter of fact but that silence has banalized I feel as a burdensome lie even as I feel the pressure of the punishment that lies ahead if I am misunderstood: the "anti-Semite" verdict is so routinely reached."

It's the usual verbal foreplay to breaking a taboo rationalized as the responsibility of the poet to prevent catastrophe. Grass describes it like this:

"Now however … as more German submarines are delivered to Israel, submarines that could fire nuclear missiles to annihilate a country where the existence of not a single nuclear bomb has been proven ... I am saying what must be said."

Grass always did tend towards delusions of grandeur, but this time he's not just tending – he's actually delusional. Has he been so busy composing broken verse that he is unaware of the many speeches by Iran's President Ahmadinejad that speak of the need to remove the "cancer" -- Israel -- from Palestine? Is that just "loud-mouthing," not to be taken seriously, just as the existence of a single Iranian nuclear bomb is "unproven" until it's used? But of course if that happened Grass would grieve for the victims, comfort the survivors, because, he writes, he feels "bound" to Israel.

"Why have I stayed silent until now? Because I thought the fact that I was German, and therefore stained, made it impossible for me to speak the truth about Israel that I am bound to and wish to stay bound to."

Grass speaks up because because he's "weary of Western hypocrisy," hoping that we can be freed from this imposed silence and demand that Israel refrain from aggression -- indeed insist that both countries accept unhindered and permanent inspections of Israel's "nuclear potential" and Iran's "facilities' by international monitors.

Note that while Israel has the potential to launch a nuclear attack, the Iranians only have "nuclear facilities' that, presumably, are used to meet its energy needs only. Israel evades inspection, while Iran enjoys nothing more than opening up its "nuclear facilities' to international monitors.

Grass has always had a problem with the Jews, but he's never expressed it as clearly as in this "poem." In an interview he gave "Spiegel Online" in October 2001 he outlined his solution to the Palestinian issue: "Israel must not only clear out of occupied areas -- the possession of Palestinian territory and settling on it is criminal behavior. It not only has to cease: it must be undone retroactively. Otherwise, there will be no peace."

That was nothing more, and nothing less, than a demand that Israel give up not only Nablus and Hebron but Tel Aviv and Haifa as well. Like Hamas and Hezbollah, Grass makes no distinction between "areas occupied" in 1948 and in 1967: for him, taking "possession of Palestinian territory and settling on it is criminal behavior." The Iranian president sees it that way too.

Ten years later, in the summer of 2011, Günter Grass was interviewed by Israeli journalist Tom Segev. Segev speaks fluent German, so he was able to talk with ease and without an interpreter for two and a half hours about everything under the sun including reactions to Grass's novel Peeling the Onion. Grass said the debate about his book had been "very painful" to him, and that it had even been insinuated that he had joined the Nazi SS of his own volition. "The truth is that I was recruited, like every youngster of my age."

When Segev asked why, in the novel, the Holocaust was given only marginal space, Grass answered: "The craziness and the crimes didn't only manifest in the Holocaust and didn't end with the war. Of 8 million German soldiers taken prisoner by the Russians, maybe 2 million survived. The rest were liquidated."

You don't have to have a degree in math to follow the logic of Grass's numbers game. Six million German soldiers were liquidated by the Russians. The facts – that actually 3 million German soldiers were prisoners of the Russians, of which 1.1 million did not survive – are not important for Grass, only one figure matters: 6 million. That's the figure it's always about. The Lucky German Number. Six million dead Jews on the one hand, 6 million dead German soldiers on the other, and we're even.

Grass is the prototypical educated anti-Semite, who means well. He's haunted by feelings of guilt and shame, but simultaneously driven by the desire for history to tally the past so that Israel, the "cause of discernible danger," is disarmed.

The Jews will never forgive the Germans for what they did to them. So for peace to finally come to the Middle East – and for Günter Grass to find some inner peace -- Israel should "become history" as the Iranian president put it. As he peels his onion, that's what the poet dreams of too.

Read the original article in German

Photo - Christoph Müller-Girod

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Geopolitics

Utter Pessimism, What Israelis And Palestinians Share In Common

Right now, according to a joint survey of Israelis and Palestinians, hopes for a peaceful solution of coexistence simply don't exist. The recent spate of violence is confirmation of the deepest kind of pessimism on both sides for any solution other than domination of the other.

An old Palestinian protester waves Palestinian flag while he confronts the Israeli soldiers during the demonstration against Israeli settlements in the village of Beit Dajan near the West Bank city of Nablus.

A Palestinian protester confronts Israeli soldiers during the demonstration against Israeli settlements in the West Bank village of Beit Dajan on Jan. 6.

Pierre Haski

-Analysis-

PARIS — Just before the latest outbreak of violence between Israelis and Palestinians, a survey of public opinion among the two peoples provided a key to understanding the current situation unfolding before our eyes.

It was a joint study, entitled "Palestinian-Israeli Pulse", carried out by two research centers, one Israeli, the other Palestinian, which for years have been regularly asking the same questions to both sides.

The result is disastrous: not only is the support for the two-state solution — Israel and Palestine side by side — at its lowest point in two decades, but there is now a significant share of opinion on both sides that favors a "non-democratic" solution, i.e., a single state controlled by either the Israelis or Palestinians.

This captures the absolute sense of pessimism commonly felt regarding the chances of the two-state option ever being realized, which currently appears to be our grim reality today. But the results are also an expression of the growing acceptance on both sides that it is inconceivable for either state to live without dominating the other — and therefore impossible to live in peace.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest