When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.


Why China's Car Industry Is Crashing On Its Own Turf

Daredevil Xie Yujun leaps over the frozen Heilongjiang River in a stunt car in Heihe, in China
Daredevil Xie Yujun leaps over the frozen Heilongjiang River in a stunt car in Heihe, in China
Zhu Shiyun

BEIJING — It is not exaggerating to describe China's automobile market as rolling into its "Golden Age."

According to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers' latest data, from January to April this year the passenger car market grew by 10% to 6.48 million cars. In comparison, for the first quarter of this year, the U.S. car market had a growth rate of 1.4%.

During the same period, China's imported car market grew more than 20%. Joint-venture brands also registered a strong growth. While the joint venture of Chinese auto group FAW and Germany's Volkswagen sold more than 920,000 cars, a growth of 17.5% compared with the same period last year, General Motors sold 1.2 million cars with a growth of 11%.

But in this context, we must also note that sales of China’s own brands haven't stopped bleeding. After three consecutive years of decline, Chinese brands' market share has now plunged to 38% overall. Thus while China's automobile market has finally and fully matured, China’s indigenous manufacturers are facing a grim outlook.


We believe the challenges that face China's own brands are two-fold, the intensifying external competition and the failure to make the necessary internal adjustments.

Independent Chinese-brand cars are being squeezed from both joint-venture manufactured cars and imported cars, first in the product lineup, second in cost.

In the compact car market, the most competitive of all, the joint-ventures are accelerating their pace. The multinational brands have a competitive advantage in both storage and distribution processes, by being able to sell the same model of car made by different Chinese joint-venture partnerships.

The best example are the various models launched by FAW-Volkswagen. These siblings born out of the same platform are at the top of the sales chart all year around. Toyota is following suit by separately offering both the American and European versions of its best-selling Corolla model to different Chinese joint venture vendors to sell.

In addition, both FAW-Volkswagen and Nissan have launched one after the other their "affordable car" series priced around 50,000 RMB ($8,010). The low-end car market is where Chinese own brands had originally staked out their territory. It remains to be seen whether the invasion of China by the global auto industry leaders will lead to a development of the domestic market or be a fatal blow for local brands.

Thanks to their greater scale and leading technology, joint-ventures can use their cost advantage to further squeeze out competitors. By manufacturing a series of models of the same class of cars using the same platform, these cars can share a high proportion of the same parts and components and thus further reduce their cost. At the same time, because of their wider sales numbers, often over a million vehicles annually, joint-venture companies possess the mean to grow further into the Chinese market.

Chang'an Zhixing SC6378, aka "Chana Star" — Photo: Ken Marshall

Too little, too late?

In comparison, most of China's local brands do not have a sufficient cost advantage to keep up with the price-reduction trend of the market. Take the best-performing Changan Automobile as an example. The company estimates it will sell 600,000 cars this year. If the joint-venture brands dip further in price it's difficult to predict how much margin the local brands have. As Dong Yang, secretary general of China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, pointed out, just one-fifth of Chinese-only brands have steady profitability, another one-fifth make a small profit and the rest are losing money.

In addition, local brands also face the double dilemma of upgrading and time pressure.

In recent years many local car makers have chosen to breakthrough by producing premium cars with higher profit margins. However the path is tough. For instance, Great Wall Hover's H8 model was forced to postpone its launch twice due to component integration problems; also Changan Automobile suspended altogether its high-end plan to focus on developing its parent brand and its R&D.

Is it too late for local carmakers to turn it around? Many of them have realized the problem and have started to transform themselves over the past two or three years ago. Several companies such as Chery and Geely have all changed their multi-branding strategy to "unification" instead. They are also trying to raise their technological level through acquisitions, fundraising and building their own auto research centers, as well as relying on international teams.

Then, there are also the uncertainties that will come as many of China's cities are tightening vehicle purchase and license restrictions. Coupled that with the overall updgrading of competition from international brands, China's automakers don't have much time to save themselves.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Smaller Allies Matter: Afghanistan Offers Hard Lessons For Ukraine's Future

Despite controversies at home, Nordic countries were heavily involved in the NATO-led war in Afghanistan. As the Ukraine war grinds on, lessons from that conflict are more relevant than ever.

Photo of Finnish Defence Forces in Afghanistan

Finnish Defence Forces in Afghanistan

Johannes Jauhiainen


HELSINKI — In May 2021, the Taliban took back power in Afghanistan after 20 years of international presence, astronomical sums of development aid and casualties on all warring sides.

As Kabul fell, a chaotic evacuation prompted comparisons to the fall of Saigon — and most of the attention was on the U.S., which had led the original war to unseat the Taliban after 9/11 and remained by far the largest foreign force on the ground. Yet, the fall of Kabul was also a tumultuous and troubling experience for a number of other smaller foreign countries who had been presented for years in Afghanistan.

In an interview at the time, Antti Kaikkonen, the Finnish Minister of Defense, tried to explain what went wrong during the evacuation.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

“Originally we anticipated that the smaller countries would withdraw before the Americans. Then it became clear that getting people to the airport had become more difficult," Kaikkonen said. "So we decided last night to bring home our last soldiers who were helping with the evacuation.”

During the 20-year-long Afghan war, the foreign troop presence included many countries:Finland committed around 2,500 soldiers,Sweden 8,000,Denmark 12,000 and Norway 9,000. And in the nearly two years since the end of the war, Finland,Belgium and theNetherlands have commissioned investigations into their engagements in Afghanistan.

As the number of fragile or failed states around the world increases, it’s important to understand how to best organize international development aid and the security of such countries. Twenty years of international engagement in Afghanistan offers valuable lessons.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest