When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Israel

Why CEOs Still Can't Say 'I'm Sorry'

Though some top executives have learned the art of apologizing, others compound their company's PR problems by failing to take responsibility. Welcome to the "aquarium!"

BP CEO Tony Hayward in May 2010
BP CEO Tony Hayward in May 2010
Maayan Manela

TEL AVIV — Facebook "forgot" to tell its users about their unwitting participation in its experiments, BP caused the history's worst oil spill, and an Israeli dairy company added silicon to milk. Companies make mistakes all the time. Some are truly grave ones. When it happens, some CEOs choose to apologize and fix the scandal, while others apparently can't bring themselves to say they erred.

Why is it so difficult for managers to apologize?

After it was revealed that Facebook engaged users in a behavioral experiment without their consent or even awareness, the company's COO Sheryl Sandberg used the semi-apology tactic. "We never meant to upset you," she said at the time, pretty much avoiding any apology at all.

Uber CEO Travis Kalanick never actually apologized after his senior vice president Emil Michael threatened to dig up dirt on journalists who criticized the company. Kalanick instead simply tweeted that Michael's comments didn't represent the company, but he didn't apologize for them. Nothing says "we're sorry" like a 140-character non-apology.

When the massive explosion on BP's Deepwater Horizon oil rig caused a devastating spill in the Gulf of Mexico — the largest in U.S. history — then-CEO Tony Hayward apologized for the disturbances the oil spill caused to the daily routine of residents. But in what The New York Times characterized as the "sound bite from hell," he immediately added, "I'd like my life back."

When a recent accident in the Trans-Israel Pipeline led to a massive oil spill in a desert nature reserve, the company not only didn't apologize but it initially reported that the spill was smaller than it actually was.

But there are executives who do apologize for mistakes. In 2007, an Israeli TV investigation revealed that products from the food company Osem were kept in the sun for hours instead of being stored in refrigerators. The CEO at the time apologized for the mistake and promised to tackle the problems.

Own it

But why is it so difficult for managers to face their clients and say, "I was wrong"?

"Managers don't apologize because an apology is seen as a weakness, and if we perceive the manager as weak, then the organization is weak, and no organization wants to be seen that way," says Tali Eichenwald-Dvir, deputy dean of the Arison School of Business at the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya in Israel.

Managers also don't want to sound inconsistent, she adds. In our culture, there is an overemphasis on consistency, and if a manager retracts or admits a mistake they are often considered inconsistent.

In addition, admitting an error quite literally has a price since taking responsibility can have financial and legal ramifications. Apart from these implications, the public response to apologies can be confusing.

"On one hand, clients might say, "what's the issue?"" says Eichenwald-Dvir. "Let the manager apologize, acknowledge the mistake and we will accept it. On the other hand, sometimes when a person apologizes, it's not really seen favorably. The public is truly divided."

And yet, she is unequivocal in her recommendation that executives apologize. A manager doesn't have to report each and every misguided decision, but when things go badly wrong, they should take responsibility.

"Every executive should consider themselves as if they were living in an aquarium," Eichenwald-Dvir says. "In the past, you could seal deals and hide mistakes not to pay the price of admitting an error. Today it's almost impossible."

And once a manager has decided to apologize, it should be a real one, not an evasive one. "The level of transparency has increased dramatically, and so has the level of customer sophistication," she says. "Today it's much more difficult to fool people. A half-apology is the most annoying thing for customers. For them the message is that the organization acknowledges the mistake but at the same time doesn't fully admit it."

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Future

AI Is Good For Education — And Bad For Teachers Who Teach Like Machines

Despite fears of AI upending the education and the teaching profession, artificial education will be an extremely valuable tool to free up teachers from rote exercises to focus on the uniquely humanistic part of learning.

Journalism teacher and his students in University of Barcelona.

Journalism students at the Blanquerna University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

© Sergi Reboredo via ZUMA press
Julián de Zubiría Samper

-Analysis-

BOGOTÁ - Early in 2023, Microsoft tycoon Bill Gates included teaching among the professions most threatened by Artificial Intelligence (AI), arguing that a robot could, in principle, instruct as well as any school-teacher. While Gates is an undoubted expert in his field, one wonders how much he knows about teaching.

As an avowed believer in using technology to improve student results, Gates has argued for teachers to use more tech in classrooms, and to cut class sizes. But schools and countries that have followed his advice, pumping money into technology at school, or students who completed secondary schooling with the backing of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have not attained the superlative results expected of the Gates recipe.

Thankfully, he had enough sense to add some nuance to his views, instead suggesting changes to teacher training that he believes could improve school results.

I agree with his view that AI can be a big and positive contributor to schooling. Certainly, technological changes prompt unease and today, something tremendous must be afoot if a leading AI developer, Geoffrey Hinton, has warned of its threat to people and society.

But this isn't the first innovation to upset people. Over 2,000 years ago, the philosopher Socrates wondered, in the Platonic dialogue Phaedrus, whether reading and writing wouldn't curb people's ability to reflect and remember. Writing might lead them to despise memory, he observed. In the 18th and 19th centuries, English craftsmen feared the machines of the Industrial Revolution would destroy their professions, producing lesser-quality items faster, and cheaper.

Their fears were not entirely unfounded, but it did not happen quite as they predicted. Many jobs disappeared, but others emerged and the majority of jobs evolved. Machines caused a fundamental restructuring of labor at the time, and today, AI will likely do the same with the modern workplace.

Many predicted that television, computers and online teaching would replace teachers, which has yet to happen. In recent decades, teachers have banned students from using calculators to do sums, insisting on teaching arithmetic the old way. It is the same dry and mechanical approach to teaching which now wants to keep AI out of the classroom.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reach your limit of free articles.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Ad-free experience NEW

Exclusive international news coverage

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Monthly Access

30-day free trial, then $2.90 per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest