When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Germany

If Germany Or France Lose Their Triple-A Ratings, It May Be History For The Euro

Europe’s financial stability agreement of 2010 is safe for now. But protecting the top credit ratings of the two biggest economies of the euro zone is the only way to ensure common currency’s survival.

Cerstin Gammelin

MUNICH - Slovakia votes yes – but so what? The European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) not only has a complicated name, it has a complicated structure. The bottom line, however, is that it's all up to Germany and France. If either loses its top AAA rating, it would spell the end of this 2010 emergency mechanism to respond to the euro zone debt crisis. And to make sure that doesn't happen, Germany's federal government will have to accept some bitter compromises.

One thing's for sure: the euro zone breathed a collective sigh of relief when Bratislava finally overcame their internal squabbles to vote "yes' to expand the EFSF.

That calmed European government fears ahead of a summit meeting later this month. And some top officials are now acting as if the EFSF is some kind of new miracle instrument for all the euro's woes. In a show of union and confidence, the hope is that the good news will act rather like a Valium on anxious citizens and nervous markets.

But look a little closer and it very quickly becomes clear that there is no way the EFSF can accomplish a miracle. Act as a tranquilizer, buy time, shore up a couple of small euro countries or their banks, yes: that it can do. Shore up a big euro country? No. And that's not necessarily because of the amount of money the EFSF has at its disposal – it has to do with its structure.

The EFSF can only work if Germany and France, the two largest economies in the currency zone, maintain their Triple-A standing with the rating agencies. Berlin and Paris's AAAs guarantee that same rating for the fund itself, thus enabling it to do its job. If either country loses their top grade, the EFSF implodes. And if that happens, it could spell the end of the euro. That's where the danger lies.

Closer than ever

In the worst crisis in its existence, the euro union is dependent on one small fragile instrument that additionally could become vulnerable to varying national interests. To be sure, until now domestic euro conflicts have only caused national collateral damage of fairly manageable dimensions. Governments changed in Ireland and Portugal; Slovakia's will now change as well. In Germany, there was some disagreement among the parties, but at the end of the day the coalition approved the EFSF. In France, approval came without much discussion.

But beneath all the current consensus are lurking worries. Acting as guarantors for the EFSF - and thus the euro itself – has linked Germany and France closer than they've ever been since the start of the currency union. So it all depends on the two countries putting their joint interest in the euro over their national egos.

Practically, what that boils down to is that Berlin and Paris, at the next meeting of euro zone bosses in Brussels, will once again have to try and put their pure national interests aside if necessary. They will have no other choice. In the interests of Europe and the euro, both countries have to do everything in their power to avoid the risk of hitting the radars of the rating agency.

So Germany is going to have to accept the fact that France is against too great a reduction in the Greek debt, and doesn't want banks on shaky ground to receive government bailout money, but get it directly from the EFSF. Anything else would mean that French debt levels would rise so significantly that the rating agencies could downgrade it.

And Paris is going to have to learn to live with the fact that the Germans want private investors to share the cost of the crisis, and that the European Central Bank can't be turned into a money printing machine. And France will also have to understand that at some point things are going to get dangerous if they keep expecting what is presently Europe's strongest economy – Germany's – to keep paying for everything. The rating agencies know full well that Germany‘s economy, while strong, isn't strong enough to rescue the euro singlehandedly – aside from the fact that its citizens wouldn't stand for it.

Anyone looking for a full picture of just how dramatic the situation is can play this little game. Take the hypothetical case that France's banks needed to be stabilized to the tune of many billions of euros, and that as a result Paris couldn't meet its austerity goals. Thumbs down from the rating agencies. The EFSF would also be reviewed and probably lose its top grade. That would force big investors, like retirement funds or insurers, to invest in German government bonds instead of the ESFS – retirement funds, for example, are only allowed to buy top-graded bonds. The EFSF would no longer be what it's supposed to be.

The alternative doesn't look a lot better. Germany could of course raise its already massive guaranties in order to ensure a top rating for the EFSF. But that would mean that the countries of northern and central Europe were basically carrying the euro: the south from Greece to France would be split off, and the currency union torn.

So it's still way too early to breathe easy for the ultimate fate of the euro.

Read original article in German

Photo - UggBoy-UggGirl

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Society

The U.S.-Colombia 'War On Drugs' Has Failed: What Comes Next?

The Biden administration and Colombia's new government seem to agree on the need for a new approach to drugs policy. But will they be able to find support in their countries to forge a new strategy?

Interpol officers accompanying the sister of Colombian drug lord "Otoniel" before her extradition to the U.S.

Luis Carvajal Basto

BOGOTÁ - Some early directives by Colombia's new president Gustavo Petro suggest he sees the 2016 peace accords with the The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) as failed or at best unfinished. Founded in 1964, FARC, the armed wing of the Communist Party, have been fighting the longest-running armed insurgency in the Western hemisphere.

Signed in 2016 under former president Juan Manuel Santos Calderón, the accords were meant to bring peace to the country, yet that peace has been patchy. This is not because another communist guerrilla force in the country, the National Liberation Army (ELN), has refused to join the peace arrangements, nor is it because of the last government's failure to implement the accord.

The problem clearly concerns drug trafficking, which has continued unperturbed since 2016. While drug use remains illegal, drug trafficking, which has long helped FARC fund its insurgency, will always be highly profitable and foment violence. So is it time to decriminalize drug use?

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
Writing contest - My pandemic story
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ