When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.


How A Franco-German Spat Over Mercedes Sheds Doubt On EU's Most Basic Rules

Berlin-based Die Welt is not taking lightly a recent EU directive that backed French bans on imports of new models of German-built Mercedes.

Mercedes SLS outside Le Bristol Hotel in Paris
Mercedes SLS outside Le Bristol Hotel in Paris
Florian Eder

BERLIN - So European Commissioner for Industry and Entrepreneurship Antonio Tajani has sided with France in its spat with Germany over the air-conditioning coolant used in some new models of Mercedes.

The issue is ostensibly one of environmental concern vs. safety, and the decision means that the cars are thus banned from import into France.

Here's the bottom line: with the blessing of the EU, certain models are not presently approved for sale in France so new Mercedes cannot be delivered to French customers of the Stuttgart manufacturer Daimler.

In a press statement, Tajani said that nothing less than the functioning of the EU’s single market was at stake here – that "concrete and urgent solutions” were needed “to re-establish conformity” in the EU's internal market. The decision, however, could result in exactly the opposite.

The consequences of the decision are far-reaching since they involve a very basic principle. "In the EU single market, both manufacturers and customers have to be able to depend on the same game rules, where national approval processes are recognized all over the EU," says Andreas Schwab, a single market expert and European member of Parliament from Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

When a product, in this case a car, gets valid approval in a member state, then that approval is valid in all 28 states. That concept was effectively killed and buried last Tuesday evening by Tajani, who is Vice-President of the Commission. Since the beginning of July, France has been refusing approval for Mercedes A-class, B-class and SL cars assembled after June 12, 2013 -- at first by simply not processing paper work and now through active refusal to approve them.

The official reason for the refusal is that the coolant Daimler is using in new vehicles does not conform to EU rules. According to Tajani, the R134a coolant has "significantly higher air pollution potential."

And if Italy follows suit?

The way French officials moved on this could well be in accordance with EU law, as they invoked Article 29 of the law on approvals of new models, which allows a ban on vehicles approved elsewhere for six months if they are deemed to present a safety, environmental or public health risk.

“Article 29 of the Framework Directive provides for the possibility for Member States to adopt temporary safeguard measures, if some conditions are met and a specific procedure is followed. If this procedure is triggered, the Commission may consider the French initiative within this framework,” read a statement issued by Tajani on Tuesday.

But according to Die Welt’s sources, France has yet to officially register its Daimler boycott with Brussels.

Daimler, however, is convinced that the law is on its side and that it has valid reasons not to use the EU-approved coolant, R1234yf. The German company argues that while it does meet EU clean air criteria, the substance poses greater safety risks, as it more easily caught fire in crash tests.

According to Tajani, Daimler didn’t present enough evidence of this, although the evidence it did provide was enough for the German Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) that approved the vehicles.

"The Commission statements don’t change our situation. Our cars have a valid, European-wide permit. Nothing should stand in the way of their being registered," a Daimler spokesperson said.

MP Schwab was on the counter-offensive last week already. "Dear Mr. Vice-President, caro Antonio," his letter to Tajani – of which Die Welt has a copy – begins. The letter goes on to say that it is legally questionable that valid type-approval could quite simply be swept aside. "For this reason I would be most grateful if you would check that this course of action conforms to single market regulations."

EU government officials are due to discuss the coolant dispute at a meeting in Brussels. Meanwhile, according to Die Welt’s sources, Italy also intends to block certain Daimler cars on its market in what boils down to a Brussels-approved model to stimulate national economies. Not surprisingly, the vehicles that Italy will block are mainly compact models that compete most closely with those of Italian manufacturers.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.


Joshimath, The Sinking Indian City Has Also Become A Hotbed Of Government Censorship

The Indian authorities' decision to hide factual reports on the land subsidence in Joshimath only furthers a sense of paranoia.

Photo of people standing next to a cracked road in Joshimath, India

Cracked road in Joshimath

@IndianCongressO via Twitter
Rohan Banerjee*

MUMBAI — Midway through the movie Don’t Look Up (2021), the outspoken PhD candidate Kate Dibiasky (Jennifer Lawrence) is bundled into a car, a bag over her head. The White House, we are told, wants her “off the grid”. She is taken to a warehouse – the sort of place where CIA and FBI agents seem to spend an inordinate amount of time in Hollywood movies – and charged with violating national security secrets.

The Hobson’s choice offered to her is to either face prosecution or suspend “all public media appearances and incendiary language relating to Comet Dibiasky”, an interstellar object on a collision course with earth. Exasperated, she acquiesces to the gag order.

Don’t Look Upis a satirical take on the collective apathy towards climate change; only, the slow burn of fossil fuel is replaced by the more imminent threat of a comet crashing into our planet. As a couple of scientists try to warn humanity about its potential extinction, they discover a media, an administration, and indeed, a society that is not just unwilling to face the truth but would even deny it.

This premise and the caricatured characters border on the farcical, with plot devices designed to produce absurd scenarios that would be inconceivable in the real world we inhabit. After all, would any government dealing with a natural disaster, issue an edict prohibiting researchers and scientists from talking about the event? Surely not. Right?

On January 11, the National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC), one of the centers of the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), issued a preliminary report on the land subsidence issue occurring in Joshimath, the mountainside city in the Himalayas.

The word ‘subsidence’ entered the public lexicon at the turn of the year as disturbing images of cracked roads and tilted buildings began to emanate from Joshimath.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

The latest