When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Saving for a rainy day
Saving for a rainy day

-Editorial-

BEIJING – At the recent International Investment Forum, Justin Lin Yifu, the former World Bank chief economist, was asked how he personally invested his money. “All my money is in the bank, in fixed deposits,” he said, before adding with a smile, “When I sleep at night, they are still earning interest for me, so I don’t have to worry.”

For an academic who “concentrates all (his) energy on doing research,” this is Lin’s best option. But in China, he is hardly alone. According to data published by the People’s Bank of China, last month Chinese saving balances surpassed 43 trillion RMB ($7 trillion). According to a Xinhua News report, China is No. 1 globally both in terms of total and per capita savings.

More than half of the wealth of Chinese households exists in the form of savings. The Chinese obsession with banks is based on citizens’ deep-rooted faith in the government. This is also the only way China has known how to drive its economy, and Lin apparently believes that investment is the major force behind China's economic growth. It would then follow that China has to maintain its relatively high savings rate to be able to stimulate investment.

But there are many reasons to doubt that this is indeed the best possible choice. There are traditional reasons why Chinese people like to save. But when they decide to leave their money in the banks, it is often simply a result of their individual anxiety.

A few years ago, when China faced extremely high inflation, and the country experienced up to 24 months of declining interest rates, people watched the real value of their money dry up. The government has now decided to guarantee that Chinese banks won’t go bankrupt. But when the deposit insurance scheme is launched, safeguarding even banks with looming debt-risks, all those Chinese savers will have even fewer reasons to sleep soundly.

So if not the bank, where?

Over the years, government policy documents have called for efforts to increase income for Chinese citizens, but that is ultimately limited because of a lack of diversified investment options. Apart from the risks and pitfalls of financial markets, the housing purchase restrictions and the recent stock market downturn have made people unsure of what to do. And in the end, people feel little choice but to return to the banks. According to the Central Bank’s urban resident savers survey conducted for the second quarter this year, 46.2% of citizens intend to save more while only 18.1% intend to consume more.

Even the Chinese government feels helpless. People’s savings have always been considered the caged tiger. After the 1998 Asian financial crisis, “Drive out the caged tigerbecame an oft repeated slogan. Amid the 2008 crisis, promoting Chinese consumption growth was also the preferred path for rescuing the economy. Alas, this caged tiger has continued to get fatter and fatter, turning round and round in the cage without being able to demonstrate its strength.

In 1998, analysis of why Chinese wouldn’t release their savings concluded that it’s because people are worried by the “three big mountains” — education, health care and old-age pensions. Today, we can add to that the pressure of rising real estate prices.

More savings means less anxiety – in simple terms, that's how most Chinese people feel. Whether in 1998 or in 2008, expanding domestic demand should have meant more consumption. But both times, expanding domestic demand has always eventually evolved into the singular quest to invest and save as much as possible.

The Chinese government thinks it has the answers. It has chosen not to stimulate the economy and not to announce large-scale investment projects. But this is still not enough to push people toward consumption. Instead, the most important thing the Chinese government can do now is ensure that people don’t have to worry about their health care, their children’s education, their retirement and their housing. Then maybe they would start to spend and consume and stimulate rather than stay seated permanently on their savings.

You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

Patronage Or Politics? What's Driving Qatar And Egypt Grand Rapprochement

For Cairo, Qatar had been part of an “axis of evil,” with anger directed at Al Jazeera, the main Qatari outlet, and others critical of Egypt after the Muslim Brotherhood ouster. But the vitriol is now gone, with the first ever visit by Egyptian President al-Sisi to Doha.

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi met with the Emir of Qatar in June 2022 in Cairo

Beesan Kassab, Daniel O'Connell, Ehsan Salah, Hazem Tharwat and Najih Dawoud

For the first time since coming to power in 2014, President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi traveled to Doha last month on an official visit, a capstone in a steadily building rapprochement between the two countries in the last year.

Not long ago, however, the photo-op capturing the two heads of state smiling at one another in Doha would have seemed impossible. In the wake of the Armed Forces’ ouster of the Muslim Brotherhood government in 2013, Qatar and Egypt traded barbs.

In the lexicon of the intelligence-controlled Egyptian press landscape, Qatar had been part of an “axis of evil” working to undermine Egypt’s stability. Al Jazeera, the main Qatari outlet, was banned from Egypt, but, from its social media accounts and television broadcast, it regularly published salacious and insulting details about the Egyptian administration.

But all of that vitriol is now gone.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
  • $2.90/month or $19.90/year. No hidden charges. Cancel anytime.
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ