When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital MagazineNEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
blog

Is Khamenei 'Dissatisfied' With Nuclear Deal?

There seemed to be confusion among Iranian politicians about the Supreme Leader's "real" position on Iran's negotiations with the West on its nuclear program, the Persian language edition of Radio France Internationale is reporting, citing several Iranian press reports.
The Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the final say on Iran's key domestic and foreign policies, has until now appeared to back the foreign-policy team that has negotiated limits on the country's nuclear program in exchange for a loosening of crippling economic sanctions.
The crucial point in agreements reached so far, which some in Iran have criticized, was Tehran's pledge to curb uranium enrichment, which the Western powers feared would lead to the production of nuclear weapons.
And now some conservative politicians in Iran are saying Khamenei was dissatisfied with the pledge to curb enrichment, according to Iranian legislator, Javad Karimi-Qoddusi, who declared that the Supreme Leader recently said he had "read the text" of Iran's Geneva accords "three times, and I do not infer halting the right to enrich uranium."
Another conservative MP Mahmud Nabavian was cited as saying that negotiators had disrespected the Leader's instructions not to "cross the red line" - meaning Iran's enrichment "rights."
Iran's moderate former president Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani then stepped in to say that Khamenei "approved the negotiating team, both before and after the negotiations," adding that such remarks sought to "discourage" Iranians, Jomhuri-e Eslami newspaper reported.
The debate is the latest fireworks in ongoing political rivalries between Iranian moderates and more hardline elements. The latter claim to have the Leader's ear and sympathies, though both sides usually wait for Khamenei's next set of declarations, to see which direction he is swaying.
RFI did, however, not that Khamenei's office had yet to contradict the recent claims about his "dissatisfaction."
-Ahmad Shayegan

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Germany

She Was The Anti-Oppenheimer, Down To The Very Last Atom

The movie ‘Oppenheimer’ makes no mention of Lise Meitner, the co-discoverer of nuclear fission. But she would have wanted it that way.

image of a woman and man in a laboratory

Physicist Lise Meitner and Otto Hahn in a laboratory, 1912

Olivia Campbell

The film “Oppenheimer,” which tells the story of the Manhattan Project’s development of the atomic bomb, has made quite a splash this summer, with audiences and critics alike hailing it as a riveting slice of scientific history. But it also has some viewers asking: Where are the women?

In the film, Lilli Hornig is the only woman scientist named and portrayed working on the project, though she was not the only one involved. Charlotte Serber, shown as project leader J. Robert Oppenheimer’s secretary, actually did far more. Some scholars argue that physicist Lise Meitner, co-discoverer of nuclear fission, should have been included.

As a biographer of historical women scientists, I should be the first in line to decry the erasure or minimization of women’s contributions. But should women be written into stories merely for the sake of representation, without first considering the context and the person? Is this what they would have wanted?

In Meitner’s case, the answer is “no.” Her discovery may have been crucial to creating the atomic bomb, but she wanted nothing to do with it nor wanted to be depicted in films about it. And I believe Meitner’s refusal to participate in the weaponization of her work on moral grounds makes her more worthy of commemoration than Oppenheimer. She chose humanity over notoriety.

Keep reading...Show less

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime.

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital MagazineNEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch

The latest