When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

There seemed to be confusion among Iranian politicians about the Supreme Leader's "real" position on Iran's negotiations with the West on its nuclear program, the Persian language edition of Radio France Internationale is reporting, citing several Iranian press reports.
The Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the final say on Iran's key domestic and foreign policies, has until now appeared to back the foreign-policy team that has negotiated limits on the country's nuclear program in exchange for a loosening of crippling economic sanctions.
The crucial point in agreements reached so far, which some in Iran have criticized, was Tehran's pledge to curb uranium enrichment, which the Western powers feared would lead to the production of nuclear weapons.
And now some conservative politicians in Iran are saying Khamenei was dissatisfied with the pledge to curb enrichment, according to Iranian legislator, Javad Karimi-Qoddusi, who declared that the Supreme Leader recently said he had "read the text" of Iran's Geneva accords "three times, and I do not infer halting the right to enrich uranium."
Another conservative MP Mahmud Nabavian was cited as saying that negotiators had disrespected the Leader's instructions not to "cross the red line" - meaning Iran's enrichment "rights."
Iran's moderate former president Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani then stepped in to say that Khamenei "approved the negotiating team, both before and after the negotiations," adding that such remarks sought to "discourage" Iranians, Jomhuri-e Eslami newspaper reported.
The debate is the latest fireworks in ongoing political rivalries between Iranian moderates and more hardline elements. The latter claim to have the Leader's ear and sympathies, though both sides usually wait for Khamenei's next set of declarations, to see which direction he is swaying.
RFI did, however, not that Khamenei's office had yet to contradict the recent claims about his "dissatisfaction."
-Ahmad Shayegan
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Geopolitics

Our 'Emotional' Divide: How The Ukraine War Reveals A World Broken In Two

Russia's invasion has created a stark global divide: them and us. On one side are the countries refusing to condemn Moscow, with the West on the other. It's a dangerous split that could have repercussions far into the future.

Protesters against the war in Ukraine demonstrate in front of the Russian embassy in London

Dominique Moïsi

-Analysis-

PARIS — "The West and the Rest of Us." That's the title of a 1975 essay written by Nigerian essayist and critic Chinweizu Ibekwe. I've been thinking about his words as the war in Ukraine both reveals and accelerates divisions of the world that I believe are ultimately "emotional" in nature.

Stay up-to-date with the latest on the Russia-Ukraine war, with our exclusive international coverage.

Sign up to our free daily newsletter.

With war returning to Europe and the risk of escalation, there is a gap between the Western view and that of the "others," a distinct "us and them." This gap cannot be explained in strictly geographical, political, and economic terms.

Keep reading... Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch Video Show less
MOST READ