When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

This is supposed to be the week that Canada and the EU ink their landmark Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) after seven years of painstaking negotiations. Hopes are fading, however, due to last-minute objections from Belgium's Wallonia region.


The French-speaking area's 3.6 million people represent less than 1% of the EU's total population. Yet Wallonia's opposition alone is enough to sidetrack the whole process. Why? Because without Wallonia on board, Belgium as a whole cannot support the massive trade deal. And without Belgium, the CETA, which requires backing from all of the EU's 28 member states, cannot proceed.


Is Wallonia about to cost the EU a golden opportunity to boost trade and demonstrate its continued relevance after the stunning Brexit blow it suffered earlier this year? Perhaps. But while many observers lament the Belgian region's obstinance, others say there are good reasons to be wary of CETA.


Chief among Wallonia's objections is that the deal favors corporate power over local legislation by allowing companies to seek arbitration in cases where their profit-making abilities are limited by host-country regulations. In other words, CETA — like most trade deals of its kind — allows foreign corporations to sue individual countries via outside tribunals.


This is no idle threat, as the tiny Central American nation of El Salvador can attest. In 2009, a Canadian mining company called Pacific Rim, frustrated by El Salvador's refusal to grant it an operating license, used a World Bank tribunal in Washington, D.C. to file a $100 million suit. The claim was later increased to $250 million.

Earlier this month, the tribunal finally reached a decision: It dismissed the suit — but only after seven years of deliberations that cost the cash-strapped Salvadoran government an estimated $13 million in legal expenses. It is another reminder that globalization, for better or worse, is a game best played with deep pockets.

Keep reading...Show less
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
Society

End Of Roe v. Wade, The World Is Watching

As the Supreme Court decides to overturn the 1973 decision that guaranteed abortion rights, many fear an imminent threat to abortion rights in the U.S. But in other countries, the global fight for sexual and reproductive rights is going in different directions.

"Don't abort my right" At 2019 pro-choice march In Toulouse, France.

Alain Pitton/NurPhoto via ZUMA
Hannah Steinkopf-Frank and Sophia Constantino

PARIS — Nearly 50 years after it ensured the right to abortion to Americans, the United States Supreme Court overturned the Roe v. Wade case, meaning that millions of women in the U.S. may lose their constitutional right to abortion.

The groundbreaking decision is likely to set off a range of restrictions on abortion access in multiple states in the U.S., half of which are expected to implement new bans on the procedure. Thirteen have already passed "trigger laws" that will automatically make abortion illegal.

U.S. President Joe Biden called the ruling "a tragic error" and urged individual states to enact laws to allow the procedure.

In a country divided on such a polarizing topic, the decision is likely to cause major shifts in American law and undoubtedly spark outrage among the country’s pro-choice groups. Yet the impact of such a momentous shift, like others in the United States, is also likely to reverberate around the world — and perhaps, eventually, back again in the 50 States.

Keep reading...Show less

When the world gets closer, we help you see farther

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter!
You've reached your monthly limit of free articles.
To read the full article, please subscribe.
Get unlimited access. Support Worldcrunch's unique mission:
  • Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
  • Stories from the best international journalists.
  • Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries
Already a subscriber? Log in
THE LATEST
FOCUS
TRENDING TOPICS

Central to the tragic absurdity of this war is the question of language. Vladimir Putin has repeated that protecting ethnic Russians and the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine was a driving motivation for his invasion.

Yet one month on, a quick look at the map shows that many of the worst-hit cities are those where Russian is the predominant language: Kharkiv, Odesa, Kherson.

Watch VideoShow less
MOST READ